The Cafe as University: Blueprint Coffee is the Department of Craft Coffee

Image

I am happy that I was able to pursue and complete this little project this weekend. I should thank Roaster and Founder Andrew Timko and Founder/Retail General Manager Kevin Reddy for spending some time with me recording interviews last Friday afternoon when they had things to do.

I digitally recorded consecutive interviews with Mr. Timko and Mr. Reddy. I didn’t think the story would flow as well if I uploaded the raw audio without proper context, and there was no simple way (for me) to get the audio on the website. I apologize for being stymied by technology. I have transcribed the interviews and have set about putting the statements and viewpoints of the two principals in an order that, with hope, makes good sense to the reader.

This is another coffee story. Why should you care? Here’s why: Learning is rewarding both spiritually and intellectually. That came across in my talks with the two men. This project has been gratifying to me in that the more I learn about Blueprint the more impressed I am. I think about my own coffee journey, drinking French Roast from a coffee machine, not knowing brewing ratios, etc. to the knowledge I have built up over the past few years, and I realize how my sensibilities have changed, and been changed by my engagement with coffee. There’s so much one can learn, yet anyone can recreate daily a fantastic coffee experience.

Another reason: the founders of Blueprint Coffee didn’t start the business to be just a local iteration of the specialty coffee scene. To paraphrase Kevin, they just happen to be in St. Louis. They are interested in being a reciprocal resource in the community in which they live, but Kevin supported his argument that the market was primed to host such a business, and they see their mandate as a national one–they actively want to drive development in specialty coffee and through their efforts and strategies plan to be relevant in the field. If they aren’t a part of that discourse a few years from now, they would not consider the business a success. If you want to see ambition in action, get down there and talk to them.

Finally, there are problems in American retail businesses today. Most of us are aware of how jobs–work–has changed over the past few decades, to the detriment of those who must work for a living. One gets the sense that everyone at Blueprint wants to be there, feels appreciated, and that individually they are working hard to master their craft. Whether it’s a hardware store or a daycare center, that’s a good model for a business. Let’s get to it…

The best teachers are lifelong learners. They also regularly reflect on how things are going so that learning may improve. Prior learning comes into play, as it is one of the ways we assimilate new ideas, bringing what we already know to a new task or information. The metaphor of the mind as a sponge is incorrect. It’s now accepted that knowledge is constructed and meant to be shared.

Whether they are conscious of it or not, the founders of Blueprint Coffee on Delmar Boulevard in St. Louis are developing a new university department: the Department of Craft Coffee. This is their mandate, their ethos, and their model, I gathered in conversations with Andrew Timko and Kevin Reddy.

I was struck by their ambition and focus, but most of all by their self-avowed orientation towards collaboration among themselves and with the wider specialty coffee community and St. Louis itself to learn how to turn out a superior product and to grow the market for it. This is a dynamic group of learner-teachers, if you listen to the language they use about their roles in the coffee business.

I referenced prior learning. This is a seasoned group of retail coffee pros. All of the employees have years of experience at other companies. They understand the importance of sharing knowledge.

The area in which they are trying to get up to speed concerns the growing of coffee. I spoke to Andrew Timko, Roaster and manager of the green coffee program about this. He is leaning on the importers to help them develop relationships going forward. He is reaching back for better information.

Andrew: “My view of it is, importers are the ones who put all the work into origin. They’re the ones that have invested in the farmer, they’re the ones that have helped educate them, they’re the ones who have helped them make transitions to specialty coffee. So, we want to see how those relationships evolve.

“Importers are the experts. So, what are we tasting? We’ve put a lot of effort into tasting and exploring, so that as things progress these relationships naturally evolve.”

This is Blueprint’s mission statement: “Blueprint Coffee seeks a mutually beneficial relationship among our producers, vendors, wholesale partners, and customers. Good coffee must be good from the start, so we dedicate a tremendous amount of time selecting a few coffees that are fresh and exciting.

The beauty of these coffees is maintained through precise roasting, brewing, and training methods. Our company was born because a handful of baristas knew there was a need for a more transparent way to serve and present coffee…”

I asked Andrew to characterize how that works in the shop:

AT: “Having an understanding of all the facets that go into coffee…from farmers preparing seeds and maintaining plants, all the way up to how you evaluate brewed coffee and espresso, then bringing that together with customer service experience.

“We want to represent and respect every aspect of coffee. We want everyone to be comfortable here, in our space. We want all of our coffees to be approachable and accessible, but we want customer service to be exceptional.

“We’re trying to bring together all elements from origin to roasting to barista preparation to service–all those things that just really make the coffee experience, the café experience, the customer interaction–positive. So, “good from the start” really just is saying, we’re not holding back anything positive, anything that makes it great.”

Kevin Reddy is the Retail General Manager at Blueprint. He put what they do in the context of the community at large:

Kevin: “Ultimately, we hope that St. Louis is recognized nationally for being a place that you can trust the food scene, the coffee scene…We’re working alongside microbreweries and high-end restaurants and cocktail bars. We think we’re helping St. Louis through the people we support in the community in its craft scene, its craft market.”

The specialty coffee market here goes back decades but has only begun to effloresce in the last five years. Some roast coffee but don’t have a retail outlet. Some others only do blends. Another business attempts to be a local version of Starbucks. A few do roasts that start at medium-dark and go through French Roast. There are only a few doing what Blueprint is doing:

KR: “The retail model we’ve set up is really the best way to market what we are trying to do. We have total control over the environment, over the product and the craft, and while our margins might not be as high in the front, that attention to detail supports a positive brand recognition that will turn into a trusted company where other shops look for their coffee, grocery stores start calling us to get us in.”

Instead of florid descriptions of flavors and sensations–and since everyone’s palate is different–Blueprint has devised a concept of a triangle pointing to “bright-body-sweet” on each package of roasted coffee. Bright is yellow, body is in blue, and sweet is colored red. Depending on intensity, each third of the triangle is colored in. If a coffee is not very bright, not much yellow will be shown, for instance. It’s a more accessible representation of a coffee’s profile.

I asked Andrew what kind of feedback they had gotten on the “bright-body-sweet” triangle:

AT: “I ask customers about that all the time. We’re trying not to describe coffees with specific terms. if they like a coffee then they can identify coffee through that profile. People’s tastes are different.”

Kevin came at it from a different angle:

KR: “In my mind our ideal customer is somebody that’s engaged in the craft and is excited to learn what we’re doing, and we’ve tried to build a space that is conducive for that tutelage. They can come in and try something different and then get a bag of coffee and go home and brew that coffee.

“I think the manual brew methods are the best way for a customer to get a high quality coffee at home. Even our menu is designed to facilitate education. It’s a conversation.

“We are trying to eliminate the mystery. There’s a science to it…but you can learn (how to adjust things)…our model is to be a resource to the community.”

Blueprint Coffee is also reaching out to the wider specialty coffee community to help drive its direction in the future. Here’s Kevin:

KR: “I hope we never get to the point where we’re stagnant. I think we need to be a dynamic model. If we sit still the industry will just pass us right by. So it’s up to us to be engaged in the coffee professional community, in national events and competitions, and be a part of the conversation about where coffee’s going so we can help define what that is in St. Louis.”

I asked Kevin what benchmark he used personally to judge that he had a good day:

KR: “When you work for somebody else for a long time you’re a voice of their brand, of their product, of what they are trying to do. Oftentimes, there’s compromises made in the quality of certain ingredients, or certain things, and you’re often sort of in a difficult position in the retail world, ’cause you’re trying to sell something that you’d rather not be selling.

“So to me, to be proud of everything we sell is, in itself, to me, I feel good about my role in life…The coffee we bring in is of a quality that I would want to share with everyone in St. Louis. I feel like I can be passionate about it. The moment I sort of lose that enthusiasm, or that I don’t care anymore about the product, it’s really difficult to take care of the customer in an honest and truthful manner.

“I happen to work in coffee, and obviously passions have taken me to this place, but if I can really take care of my customers well, then that’s it, that’s all I need. And if that’s the case then you start to have customers come back and come back and come back; that’s how you build the business.

“I’m very fortunate. Obviously I had goals coming into opening a business, but I never expected it to be what it is right out of the gate. We’re delivering coffee to the community that is on par with some of the best in the country, in my mind, and I don’t suspect that will ever change because that is sort of the ‘elevator pitch’. That’s our business.

“We’re aware of the price points, we’re aware of the business, we’re aware of the demands of wholesale and retail, we’ve all worked in it; we understand the business but we came into it with no other goal than to be the best.”

He added they’ve had very little pushback on the prices for their coffee. He said people come in and understand right away that this is a different kind of coffee shop. Kevin believes in the value of their offerings.

Andrew defined success of the company:

AT: ” Success would be if five-ten years down the road all these little seeds, these beginnings–pun intended, coffee’s a seed–have started to grow and take root.

“Obviously if we’re around in five or ten years we’re paying the bills, but then if we’re not having solid relationships with farmers, and not doing something at origin, and we are not doing something in the roasting and barista community that has impact on the larger specialty coffee community, then I would not consider that success.

“Through the work…the desire to have a roaster community in St. Louis, the contributions I’ve made to education through SCAA, (Specialty Coffee Association of America) and also what I’ve received from SCAA, have given me a passion to build the community. There’s always been this amazing thing that has come out of people sharing their knowledge, people trying to improve specialty coffee in every way. From five years ago to today, the advances in specialty coffee have been enormous.”

See what I mean? And they’re a part of it. Blueprint and the university nearby, Washington University, are becoming mutually dependent on each other. Perhaps one day there will be an endowed chair in the Department of Craft Coffee, and his name will be Kevin or Andrew.

Thanks for reading.

 

 

 

 

 

Angel in the Outfield

I wrote about the logjam in the St. Louis Cardinals starting rotation last time. Now it’s time to turn our attention to the outfield situation heading into 2014.

By the end of the World Series a large slice of Cardinal Nation had become disenchanted with the productivity of both third baseman David Freese and centerfielder Jon Jay. By three weeks after the end of the Series, which the Cardinals lost, Cardinals GM John Mozeliak signaled the club’s own disaffection by packaging Freese with reliever Fernando Salas and sending him to the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim for centerfielder Peter Bourjos and power-hitting prospect Randall Grichuk.

Many casual fans might have thought that Mozeliak had his wet finger in the wind, doing fans’ bidding in one fell swoop–disposing of the formerly universally beloved 2011 World Series MVP in Freese and relegating Jay to a peripheral role on the club. This would allow 2013 breakout star Matt Carpenter to shift from second base back to his preferred position at third base, (and open second base for Kolten Wong, their first-round pick in 2011). Bourjos would be ticketed to be the starting centerfielder.

But John Mozeliak is a leader–the leader of the organization, and his pragmatism, vision, and team circumstances will dictate just which group of players receives the bulk of playing time in the St. Louis Cardinals outfield next season. I assert in this post that the ideal lineup would not include Bourjos on a regular basis; that he will likely find himself in the situation he endured with the Angels as a part-time player. The devil may be in the details, but the (former) Angel will not be in the outfield very much if things work according to plan.

That’s mainly because the best hitting prospect in the organization since Albert Pujols is slated to arrive on the big club in 2014 in the form of outfielder Oscar Taveras. He has been compared to a left-handed hitting Vladimir Guerrero: able to square up a variety of offerings and drive them hard. His bat is deemed ready right now. He is the main reason the Cardinals essentially said goodbye to the productive rightfielder Carlos Beltran, who wanted a multi-year contract. The question is can Taveras handle centerfield. He isn’t considered an elite defender, so the thought is he’d look best in an outfield corner.

Those spots are taken by Matt Holliday and Allen Craig. Holliday is a fixture in left because of his contract and consistency. Matt has been a very good offensive producer his entire time on the Cardinals. He will be 34 in the coming season, with three years left on what is increasingly looking like a team-friendly contract. Craig is supposed to take over in right field next season. He has been injury-prone and will be coming back from a Lisfranc injury to his left foot. He’s been a very good #4 hitter the last two seasons, playing most of the time at first base.

The Cardinals have six outfielders on their roster. They won’t enter the season with Holliday, Craig, Bourjos, Jay, Taveras, and Shane Robinson.

By late in the postseason it appeared that the Cardinals liked the right-handed hitting Robinson over Jay, who bats and throws left, if you noticed the change in how assignments were being doled out. Robinson seemed more steady in the field and was putting the ball in play more often. Jay took a step back defensively in 2013; he went from being above average to a bottom-dweller, according to advanced statistics.

Bourjos and Robinson are similar players. Both bat right-handed. Bourjos may have a little more speed, pop, and baserunning ability. Taking into account their age difference (Bourjos is two years younger), and the fact they traded Freese for him, if it came down to Bourjos or Robinson the latter would find himself on the outside looking in.

They’d like to keep Jay since he reliably gets on base against right-handers. The problem–the irony really–is that neither Bourjos nor Robinson are especially good against left-handers, negating a potentially effective platoon rotation of outfielders. They’re trying to upgrade centerfield defense, and there are more right-handed pitchers than left-handed, so that mitigates against the idea anyway, as that would mean Jay still got most of the playing time.

This is predicated on a situation in which Craig is healthy and Taveras for some reason is not ready for regular duty. One could imagine an outfield of Holliday, Bourjos, and Craig from left to right. Bourjos is a premier defender who would upgrade the range in center, which would be needed with Holliday and Craig on his flanks.

But Bourjos has a worrying injury history. He has chronic wrist and hamstring problems. 2013 was pretty much a lost season for him. Taveras is coming off season-ending ankle surgery last July. His physical status is still uncertain.

One can see why with the loss of Beltran and the expected replacement of him by Taveras the Cardinals would still be looking for and stockpiling outfielders when they made the Freese trade. This is also why it would not be prudent for fans’ expectations to be too high for Peter Bourjos as a Cardinal.

Mozeliak did not fleece the Angels. This was a baseball trade–the two teams had different needs and they filled them with two guys who weren’t very good last season. They may both bounce back, but the Cardinals had a strategic plan to reconstruct their roster and believed they could become more athletic and better in the field without losing too much offense. It was clear to Mozeliak that the Cardinals had to upgrade athletically at several spots to get better defensively while bolstering the diversity of the attack. The Cardinals were mediocre defensively and were 13th in the league in home runs. One reason is they got 9 all season from their third baseman. That’s OK if the defense is great, and there’s speed and dynamism elsewhere. His defense was putrid, and there wasn’t.

Holliday. Taveras. Craig. Two established sluggers who get on base at a good clip coupled with a 22-year’old hitter with a very high ceiling on his ability. That’s my favorite outfield. Bourjos is #4, chiefly as the first option in center. Maybe Taveras moves around, working his way in by playing in right one day and in center two days later. Jay can be on the bench.

It’s strange that although Robinson may have temporarily moved ahead of Jay on the depth chart he may be the one expendable with the arrival of Bourjos. The Cardinals seek balance and they presently have it. They also have a lot of talent. To top it off, they get a high draft pick from the Yankees since they signed Carlos Beltran yesterday.

Must be good to be Mo. Chris Carpenter retired. Jake Westbrook is off the books. Their third baseman and rightfielder are gone. They just made it to Game 6 of the World Series, and there’s little reason to think they won’t be a better club next season. I’ll cover the good news on the infield in the next Cardinals post.

Indifference Point

I was listening to “Radiolab” on the radio today and they discussed the concept of the “indifference point”. The indifference point as I understood it is the tempo most musicians and/or listeners prefer in a piece of music. Take Beethoven’s Third Symphony, “Eroica”, for instance. There’s some controversy over how fast Beethoven wanted the music to be played. What has been learned is that when something is perceived to be too slow the players wish to speed it up; or if it’s thought to be too fast they endeavor to slow it down. Eventually, most musicians guess at a point (tempo) that feels right. Clearly disparate groups can arrive at varying “indifference points” if you’ve listened to many recordings of the Third Symphony. Some are brisk and move along at a breakneck pace, while others are stately and almost ponderous. I submit the best interpretations lie between those two extremes, like von Karajan’s version with the Berlin in 1963. It’s majestic

and

propulsive.

The indifference point as it relates to the St. Louis Cardinals roster heading into the 2014 season pertains to my state of mind about who of a few candidates must go to make the club a functioning, cohesive and balanced group when the games start to count in April. They have too many starting pitchers, and someone must go. I don’t want any of them to go, but considering the 25-man roster and the way the club is constituted there simply isn’t room for all of them. The forthcoming is premised upon taking present rules for granted, assuming the health of all involved, (more on that later), and, the fact that I am not privy to all the options Cardinals management has regarding younger pitchers like Joe Kelly, Michael Wacha, Shelby Miller, Carlos Martinez, and even Lance Lynn. (By options I mean can they be sent down to the minors, for how long, and how many times this could be done in each case).

Right now the Cardinals have seven starting pitchers for a five-man rotation. I will put them into subgroups thusly:
Locks: Adam Wainwright, Shelby Miller, Michael Wacha.
Tentatively In: Lance Lynn, Joe Kelly.
Comeback Candidate: Jaime Garcia.
Outside Looking In: Carlos Martinez. Let’s pick those apart in reverse order.

The Cardinals, in their exit interview with Martinez told him to prepare to start when the season arrives. Martinez is a high-ceiling talent who started throughout his rise from the minors. Deriving maximum value from a good pitcher means giving him more, rather than fewer, innings. Martinez would have more value providing 180 innings of work than, say, 60 innings. You want your best pitchers to throw the most innings. Martinez, who hit 101 mph on his fastball out of the bullpen and flashed an outstanding slider, has as much upside as anyone on the staff. He is also 22 and under team control contractually for years. He would be very effective–but possibly wasted–in a bullpen role.

Joe Sheehan has done research on taking young starters, moving them to the bullpen, and then converting them back into starters. The results are not particularly salubrious. He found only two recent examples of players who succeeded on such a path: Chris Sale of the Chicago White Sox and Adam Wainwright of St. Louis. Most pitchers were ineffective as starters, got hurt, or were even ineffective as relievers. Examples recently are Wade Davis, Neftali Feliz, Alexi Ogando, and Joba Chamberlain. Sheehan’s conclusion is that clubs have one free shot: if you want to leverage a high-end starter as a reliever that’s fine, but to go from starter to reliever and back to starter is too risky, a bridge too far.

His point was that starting pitchers cannot be developed in the bullpen in today’s game, since relievers are mostly turned into one-inning pitchers. He believes the evidence says that unless and until MLB rediscovers the long-relief role– where young guys used to break in by pitching multiple innings per appearance, building arm strength– pitchers would be protected by defining expected workloads early on.

This is now where they are with Carlos Martinez. It’s believed that he is capable of ramping up his workload safely after performing one-to-two- inning stints for less than half a season. But the evidence suggests that to jerk him back again (to the bullpen) in order that he can be of some utility to the team might be inadvisable.

This is why Trevor Rosenthal of the Cardinals and Aroldis Chapman of the Cincinnati Reds are probably “doomed” to close games for their respective teams. They’re too good at what they do to change their roles, and it would be too risky to ask them to work a lot more since they have become so acclimated to their present regimen for so long. It’s too late for them.

Rosenthal would be crestfallen to learn this. He wants to start. Cardinals GM John Mozeliak essentially told him in November Sorry, we like you right where you are. You’re our closer. I think that’s the right decision for the Cardinals going forward.

Chapman likes closing. He prefers it. He apparently doesn’t want a heavy workload and likes to throw the ball as hard as he can. Max effort can’t take you through seven innings, and when you can touch 104 miles an hour with strikes and pair it with a devastating left-handed slider it literally is game over when he arrives on a scene. His new manager Bryan Price, the former pitching coach, was an early advocate for max value from Chapman, as a starter. The organization has concluded that it would be best for both parties for Chapman to finish games, or be available regularly for high-leverage situations, as the need arises.

This is a long way of making the point that I think Carlos Martinez is too valuable as a starting pitcher not to have him do it. This is why I think he will start, and it will be at AAA Memphis when the season begins. He will be insurance for:

The Comeback Candidate, Jaime Garcia: Garcia, the only left-hander among the seven, is coming off moderately invasive shoulder surgery. He missed most of 2013. Already having had Tommy John surgery in 2008 to replace the ulnar collateral ligament in his elbow, he will have a daunting task coming back from the shoulder procedure and the concomitant rehabilitation. Shoulders are much more dicey for pitchers as the joint is more unstable than an elbow; there’s much more range of motion involved. The history of pitchers coming back from shoulder surgery is not nearly as good as that of those who have had elbows repaired. Although they have a chunk of guaranteed cash invested in Garcia, at present the Cardinals cannot count on him being available in 2014.

It would be good to have Garcia back. He has value as a quality left-hander and the Cardinals are paying him like a starter. He has little trade value now since he has not proved himself durable and effective. Ideally, he would be a rotation fixture.

Which leads to those Tentatively In: Lance Lynn and Joe Kelly. Both are young, cost-controlled power pitchers, although Lynn is soon due for a bump in pay from arbitration. He’ll have a case from the traditional standpoint, as he has won 31 games in the past two seasons.

Since they are both young, have proved they can effectively eat innings and are cheap they would be valuable trade commodities. Both are exemplars of why the Cardinals system is envied: they are home-grown talents, years from free agency. This is how good teams are sustained in baseball today.

I am indifferent as to which one must go. If I had my druthers it would be Kelly, because although he throws very hard he misses surprisingly few bats for that velocity. I don’t think he has great secondary pitches or the upside of Lynn. Lynn, however, could bring back more in a package, as he’s had success at this level longer than Kelly and is still inexpensive.

Wainwright is the ace. Wacha and Miller are number one draft picks that the organization sees as rotation cornerstones for years to come. The Cardinals appear to be invested in their futures. Realistically, only one of Lynn or Kelly would have to go because of the status of Garcia, and the uncertainty surrounding the progress of Martinez. Having said that, I can see the Cardinals attempting to “pull a Kelly” with one of these guys when injuries or regression hit. (Kelly was stashed in the bullpen at the start of last season, where he languished due to disuse and inconsistency until Garcia was shut down and he took his place in the rotation–after a brief, failed flirtation with left-hander Tyler Lyons). It may be that they try to muddle through with one in the bullpen and one at Memphis, or on the disabled list.

The fact is that all seven have legitimate claims to be in a major league rotation, and they should be. The club, however, has a few more needs going into next season, like a utility infielder who bats right-handed and can get on base at a decent rate.

Hmm…I’ve written an equivocating, indifferent piece. Perhaps that’s as it should be. I hope it has conveyed a work-in-progress feel a general manager must inhabit as he crafts a roster while the air is cold, the stadium is dark, and spring training is still more than a hundred days away. Maybe John Mozeliak is at the indifference point, observing a tonic interlude between the release of tension provided by the trade of David Freese/ signing of Jhonny Peralta, and the buildup of tension engendered by the apprehension of unfinished business.

When I conceived this article I saw 26 names for 25 spots. I thought I could justify a two-for-one dump of a pitcher and a reserve outfielder for a Martin Prado type. (Not likely to begin with, as he wants to play every day and makes $10 million. I don’t know of any $10 million bench players. Vernon Wells?) That’s not necessary! I don’t believe “these things have a way of working themselves out”. Every team has imbalances every year…they should be minimized, shortened in duration of time; not allowed to reverberate throughout the organization.

Now that I’ve thought through the process, and noted the questions around two of the proposed starters, I’m more convinced they might take the latter path, trying to hang on to all seven, at least until some answers are provided by Memorial Day. Thanks for your patience. I’ll touch on other imbalances on the roster in a future post.

Reflections of a Self-Conscious Twitterer

Personal history, events, choice, and the cultural tools of society among many other things forge the shaping of an identity. The overlay of culture and its creations impinge upon, constrain, challenge, reinforce, or allow to bloom an individual’s conscious identity.

Twitter, a “social media” tool, highlights the imperative to craft an identity. It’s another venue where we can check ourselves within the maelstrom that is the onrushing digital life. And see who’s hot or funny or vulgar. Check all three? “That’s gold, Jerry, gold!”

That just came to me. When I got the impetus to write this I thought about the “Seinfeld” episode in which George says everything he’s done in life is wrong. Jerry says to him, “If everything you’ve done is wrong, then the opposite would have to be right. Do the opposite.” George temporarily takes him up on it.

That’s sort of what I’m doing here. I want to interrogate why I use Twitter, what I hope to get out of it; perhaps start a conversation about why you are here.

The idea that I could have an interaction–however faux–with someone I admired was and still is an attraction of the service. I’ve just lowered my sights after a strange set of events near the beginning of my time on Twitter. But enough of that.

I am not looking for friends here. I am uncomfortable with it, but I would not preclude friendship, were it to develop. I prefer a more organic way to develop camaraderie, but my opportunities for such have dwindled, frankly. I’d like to get what I can take.

I do want to connect, and I crave feedback. Writers want criticism if it’s relevant, fair, and of utility to them.

So how much do we give of ourselves, how much do we divulge? We all struggle with it for one reason or another, or to varying degrees. What is your identity? Is it in flux? Having a hard time? Are you good? What’s your angle? Are you a bot? Could you be a psychopath?

Twitter is so unnatural to our past way of being. Never before have we had a megaphone to the world–a channeled one, to be sure, but this flavor of the internet has made the world a smaller place. I learned I have something in common with a Japanese woman who writes for the New York Times from Tokyo: we like baseball, and have corresponded about a guy who played in Nippon Pro Baseball and the National League.

How unnatural is it? It can be surpassingly novel if you are new to it or you are restless and seek new voices. It can be jarring. Yet it also is a too-familiar simulacrum of the world we inhabit, with its culture of celebrity and hierarchy of authority. So, it’s not too exotic a place. We should rectify that.

Why don’t people engage me, I wonder. Partly it’s because they can’t get a handle on why they should care. What’s the disconnection? Fame, notoriety, or noted expertise. I’m working on that.

Of course, this is why I don’t follow you, and why famous people do not appear in my list of followers. I’m no better than you in this respect. One caveat: I’m a news/baseball junkie, so a lot of my follows are of sources, official or otherwise.

The fact is I have no idea why the people who follow me do so! They don’t say anything to me. They stand as mute observers. It’s odd.

I have not taken the time to see what they are saying to others, to find out if they would interest me. (I can contemplate this since my group is so small.) I think it’s incumbent upon those on the service to have something to say. I will go out on a limb to assert that sitting and monitoring the passing parade isn’t enough. Join the fray. I will resolve to engage them, too.

This is all very obvious and you can call me naive. You can infer that my personal social network is weak and not strong and that I should do something about it. You would be right. There are extenuating circumstances, you see…

But this leads to the paradox referenced above. We sit back saying, “Prove yourself to me. Make me think. Give me news. Above all, entertain me!” Is that right? It can be, but it’s so vaguely, deeply unsatisfying. The same old cliques and mores are reified within yet another space we virtually inhabit.

Perhaps I’m expecting more out of Twitter than it can provide. Somehow, that doesn’t seem right, though. It can be wondrous: the first news of import; links to great stories; ingenious language uses unique to the format; a photo of cute schoolgirls in Haiti, and on and on.

For me, Twitter is a metaphor for how I often feel–that I’m shouting down a well, heard only by myself, frustrated…impotent. Incapable of moving the needle on public opinion or private sentiment.

But I’m not without a voice. I’ve stopped fretting that I got little traction. There was no bait and switch. The meritocracy of the word does not reign supreme. I still wonder…

Here it is: I’m much more interesting than I’m being given credit for. There’s a dearth of evidence that I am appreciated. What was that? “I’m not going to be ignored!” LOL…go fuck yourself.

The virality of the inanity I get, so to speak. It seems that by dumb luck someone should’ve caught something from me by now.

But it’s out there, ephemeral yet permanent, inscribed on the web, topical, and maybe timeless.

Maria Bustillos writes for the New Yorker, often about writing. This week she wrote about how writers, anonymous or infamous, become tied to their work in the public consciousness. She wrote,

“Beyond this…lies the deeper problem for those who imagine that they can write, and yet escape a reckoning. Writers are generally fated to commit the truest parts of themselves to the page, whether they choose to own their work in public or not. That is the ultimate vulnerability, and it is inescapable.”

I choose to, and will continue to do so. I await any applicable reckoning. That’s what I do here On the Top Step.

Consistency In Home Coffee

image

That’s a bird seed scoop–$3 at PetSmart that serves as my ground coffee receptacle every morning. I had been looking for a funnel or just some cleaner way of transferring coffee from a container to the glass beaker. You slide that guillotine-like hatch with your thumb and the grounds–mostly without fines–slide right out with a few taps into the center of the beaker bottom. A few shakes evens it out and now the unit can be placed on a scale. I weigh the beans and water. I use a 1:15.5 ratio, so 37 grams of beans get 574 grams of water. This comes to two diner-size cups of coffee. The Grindmaster 495 is in the basement. This 1996-vintage behemoth makes a racket, and frankly I enjoy the walk upstairs taking in the aromas of the freshly-ground beans while the water is just about to boil. It’s part of the experience. I outlined the advantages I have with home roasting versus the specialty coffee roaster/retailer in a previous post but neglected to go in-depth on consistency as it relates to brewing and roasting. On brewing, I trust I’ve shown that I can exactly replicate the formula on a daily basis. Your local pourover purveyor cannot. But, I’ll give her that. Let’s assume that she is getting her formula right, every time. Ponder that the next time she’s swirling water around with the gooseneck kettle. This leads us to the consistency of roasting. There they have me beat. With an expensive drum or some type of hybrid air/drum system they can tinker endlessly and go through kilos of coffee, cupping it to find the ideal roast for a particular varietal, changing drying times or air flow introductions to create a “profile” for that coffee. Want it more juicy? Shorten the drying stage. Want the brightness more mid-palate than upfront? Hit it with air sooner. These are crude simplifications but are the sorts of things roasters do. They can dial in a roast and program it. That I can’t do. I alluded previously to the fact that in some ways this is another advantage I enjoy: I get to try coffees myself at different roast levels, featuring various characteristics, without burning through all my coffee in the process. But the real secret is that I have no “profiles” for my coffees, or, I just have one. I roast the same way every time! I should admit that I am loathe to change things that are working, and I probably should experiment more, but after doing this a while and learning that drum profiling just does not translate to hot air popper roasting I found my coffee consistently better when I followed some guidelines. My poppers are not modded. I am not a handyman nor am I good with circuits and electricity. Forget it. It took me months to get up the gumption to simply try roasting this way. What helps are the soup can chimney and a digital thermoprobe affixed to the chimney with high-temperature tape. The probe end angles in from the bottom of the chimney into the roast chamber. The readings help me understand where I am in the roast, along with the use of other senses such as sight, (color of the beans), smell, (changes from grassy to sweet to ashen, if you go that far), and sound, (the onset of the first pops, etc.) In order to guarantee that there’s a chance I will like the end product I make sure to do these things: Chris Schooley of Sweet Maria’s has found that if drying stages are extended especially on high altitude cultivars sweetness can be intensified. This means I do pauses. I turn off the popper for 20 seconds at 40 seconds in and at 1:40 in. When I resume I am watching to hit 400 degrees F while monitoring a timer and the beans. Carl Staub of the SCAA has the science on something called the Best Reaction Ratio. In brief: “The best cup characteristics are produced when the ratio of the degradation of trigonelline to the derivation of nicotinic acid remains linear…Monitoring the bean temperature offers a good method of approximating the reaction distribution during this phase of the roasting. The ideal environmental temperature, ET, for best reaction ratio, BRR, is from -400-424 degrees F…” (SCAA Roast Color Classification System developed by Agtron-SCAA 1995). I don’t have the bean temperature but I do have the ET readings. So I endeavor to hang around a little bit between 405-430 degrees. Through trial and error I have learned how to stay in that zone without unnecessarily delaying the onset of a vigorous first crack. It’s a blunderbuss method, but I use a table fan. If the temperature is rising too fast I can direct blowing air in there, which stabilizes or temporarily drops the temperature slightly. I make sure that I don’t leave that zone too fast or prematurely. You want a vigorous start of first crack. You don’t want to sputter in-or-out of the first crack. Simultaneously, you don’t want to rush through the crack. Here the fan can be used again, sparingly. I determine a hot, on-the-fly end of the first crack. From previous roasts I’ve pre-set how long I will go after the crack is finished. (Always do a roast log). The fan is used at the end for a 20-second burst. ET in air roasters is supposed to be flat at finish, with bean temperature slightly ramping up to meet it near the end of the roast. I have done this with low-grown Brazils to high-grown Guats and Ethiopias. Of course there are surprises. Every roast is different. I had some trouble with two Rwandas–they were both Bourbon; I got them at different times. The Rwanda Kanzu Bourbon had to be stopped no more than 25 seconds post-first crack to salvage a sweet City +. If I stopped there on Rwanda Tumba Cocatu I’d have a City roast and so many quakers I’d barely get a day out of it. I almost gave up on Cocatu, until I went one minute past first crack. Reps, baby. I had it this morning–juicy, complex, then creamy. Love my Cocatu! It’s like tasting the difference between color- and black-and-white television. Your intrepid reporter gave them another shot, just before setting this down. Man, it was good, a light-roasted Kenya. I gotta give it up to them. But it was monochromatic compared to the technicolor hues I experienced earlier today. The rugged car commercials always say “Professional driver–closed course–do not attempt”. This is one area where I went and tried it myself, and the results are better than adequate. I guess I’m lucky to be roasting for only one. That doesn’t sound right! Oh, well. I hope to meet the girl with the demitasse tattoo. I don’t like tattoos…

Who’s On First, or, Who’s Confused Yet?

No, I’m not reworking the old Abbott and Costello bit, just thinking out loud about a conundrum facing the St. Louis Cardinals regarding roster construction as GM John Mozeliak must make some decisions before spring training begins late this winter. The latest information coming out makes unclear the roles of two players in particular–Allen Craig and Matt Adams–both ostensibly first basemen with different profiles and attributes. I’ll delve into that presently.
I should preface this post by noting the oddly disconcerting news that there was a shakeup at the local ESPN sports radio affiliate yesterday. A character in the “Yu Is So Right” post was based on–I wrote “a composite of”–a personality who lost his job. Of course I am not presumptuous enough to claim credit or blame for this circumstance, I just thought it was ironic, and kind of a shame. Listeners will lose the insights of the main Cardinals beat reporter, an indefatigable nerd who knows the club as well as anyone and is good at explaining sabermetrics, and a guy deployed by the station to cover the baseball team full-time and had access to all the principals.
The boss at the station is “Hoss” Neupert. I did not make that up.
What we’ve heard recently are some statements that confuse. Some context: Allen Craig is the de facto first baseman. He is 29, a RH hitter, who just had a very good season and is making $6 million per year for the next four years. He is also injury-prone. He was out from September 4th until the World Series in the third week of October, which is the earliest he could make it back. He has a Lisfranc injury to his left foot. Such an injury can take months from which to recover and often leads to painful arthritis down the line.
Matt Adams is a 23-year-old LH batter whose only position is first base. Although agile, he’s a hulking 260-pounder who already runs like a wounded Matt Stairs. He’d been an effective power bat off the bench who assumed first base after the Craig injury. He hit 17 home runs in just less than half a season’s typical plate appearances, so the Cardinals see him as a legitimate 30+ home run threat given a full season of at-bats.
And this is what the Cardinals need. Their power was down this year. They scored only 26% of their runs by the homer, which was near the bottom of the league; they were extremely dependent upon stringing skeins of hits together, and were amazing with runners in scoring position–but it’s not a skill per se and not something upon which they can rely. See Jon Lester, World Series.
It appears the Cardinals’ best home run hitter the last two seasons, Carlos Beltran, will leave for a multi-year deal. The right fielder has several suitors willing to sacrifice a top draft pick they’d have to give up to pry him away from St. Louis, who offered him a one-year qualifying offer, which prompts draft pick compensation if he rejects the offer and signs somewhere else.
This leaves right field “open”. So put Craig there, right? He’s a good athlete whose bat profiles well in an outfield corner. Give first base to Adams, who will offer the most power on the club and handled defensive chores pretty well.
But the Cardinals have the best hitting prospect in the minor leagues in Oscar Taveras. He was ranked one or two as the best prospect in baseball in 2013. His bat is ready now. They are not so sure about his route-running and arm accuracy in the outfield. Ideally, Taveras could take over in center field, supplanting the mediocre Jon Jay and forcing him to a bench role. But we’re hearing that the Cardinals want Taveras to just worry about mashing the ball and don’t anticipate expecting him to man a premium defensive position in center. So they’ve told reporters Taveras will be in right, and they don’t plan for Adams to be blocked any longer.
What does this mean for Craig? And for center field? They’ve intimated they were dissatisfied with Jay’s performance. Would they go after Jacoby Ellsbury to play center? What about shortstop, the most pressing need of all? Would they sign Stephen Drew? (Two draft picks; both Scott Boras clients. Don’t think so.)
What this all points toward is 1) a trade may be imminent; and/or 2) they could decide to get Stephen Drew, which would make the Cardinals lineup heavily left-handed.
They may move Matt Carpenter to third base, displacing David Freese. Then they could insert the LH-hitting Kolten Wong at second. Drew is a lefty hitter. So is Taveras. That would leave Matt Holliday and Yadier Molina as the only right-handed hitters in the usual lineup.
That’s great on most days when they would be facing right-handers but far less than ideal against lefties. They had tremendous difficulty with lefties this year, even featuring righties such as Craig, Molina, Holliday, Freese, and the switch-hitting slugger Beltran. I think it’s an anomaly but it’s also a fact.
I have to believe that they want their money’s worth from Allen Craig, who has been their best hitter the last two years. Perhaps it’s a smokescreen, (WHY?) they’ll keep everybody and Taveras will go to center.
We know the organization is determined to move on several fronts–shortstop and center, and likely at third, and has hinted that it’s time to go outside the organization to fill these needs.
Could we please have the DH, so we could reasonably keep these guys? Is it time to move pitchers–of which they certainly have a surplus–and package them with Craig to bring Troy Tulowitzki to St. Louis to play short and bring right-handed thump? Did I note that he’s 30, injury-prone and expensive? Oh, my. They’d have to give up some Faberge eggs to get Tulo in the form of premium young, cost-controlled power arms. Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports said it would take Craig, Shelby Miller and Trevor Rosenthal to get Tulo from Colorado. No, thanks.
So, this reporter is anxious to see Oscar Taveras. He’s considered the best Cardinals hitting prospect since Albert Pujols. It’s the cascade of related matters providing the tipover into anxiety. Mo, can we talk?

Yu Is So Right

The following story is fiction. Some of the persons are real, one is a composite of local sports radio personalities, and one is named Bob.
Yu Darvish is a star pitcher with the Texas Rangers. He’s just finished his second season in the American League after coming over from Nippon Pro Baseball in Japan. He was invited to Game 1 by Mike Napoli, a former Ranger now on the Red Sox.
So Taguchi played in both leagues, won a championship in Japan on a club with Ichiro, and had some big hits as a member of the St. Louis Cardinals in the early 2000’s. He’s calling the World Series for Japanese television.
Jamey Wright has pitched in the big leagues for 17 years. He’s a journeyman who’s attending the Series in Boston.
Cryin Dull is a St Louis “insider” on the Cardinals who works for the local FM ESPN radio affiliate.
Bob is a smarty-pants wanna-be interlocutor/assistant/conscience for and of Mr. Dull.
They’ve convened at Fenway Park in Boston hours before Game 1 of the World Series between the Cardinals and Red Sox. Players from both teams are taking turns on the field. The group is sitting together halfway up the stands on a cool but sunny New England afternoon.
This is what was overheard…
Dull: Yu, So, Mr. Wright, how ya doin’?
In unison: Great, you?
(Darvish snaps his head around).
Dull: Great. Say Yu, how good is that arm?
Darvish: My right arm is fine.
Dull: So, (Taguchi snaps his head), you enjoying the AL?
Darvish: I am.
Dull: He’s really been impactful, right Jamey?
Wright: Um, yes.
Dull: Hey, is that Saltyamacchia?
Bob: It’s Saltalamacchia. (Whispering).
Dull: Irregardless, that guy’s playing tonight.
Bob shakes his head.
Dull: So, (Taguchi…) in regards to your career Mr. Wright, or Jamey, did you feel like you had a good season?
Wright: I would have liked a better ending.
Dull: Well, there was a lot of reasons the wheels came off, right?
Wright: Sort of.
Dull: Talk about it.
Wright: Well, I thought my role would be a bigger one than it was.
Dull: Don’t you mean than WHAT it was?
Wright: I’m not sure…
Dull: Nevermind. So, (Taguchi…) you know, (Darvish…) you literally came a long way over the years.
Wright: Yeah, a lot of riding buses. In the Carolina League our uniforms would get torn and we had nobody to repair ’em. I had to learn to sew. Found a kit at a Rite-Aid.
(Bob shares a smirk with Wright. Bob’s pretending not to be listening to the conclave but he can’t help himself.)

Allen Craig limps onto the field to attempt some light running. The Cardinals slugger suffered a Lisfranc injury to his left foot after rounding first base in a game at Cincinnati on September 4th. He’s only now become available to play in the World Series. Taguchi is intrigued.
Taguchi: Why is he limping?
Dull: It’s the foot.
Taguchi: Which foot?
Dull: Craig’s foot. It’s that foot that he’s fighting.
Taguchi: Left or right? (Exasperation mounts. Darvish is starting to sweat, even though the air is crisp and he’s just sitting there. Wright is looking anywhere but at Dull, because he’s fuming.)
Dull: It’s the foot that is in front when he bats–the front foot.
(Taguchi starts to frown).
Taguchi: So he hasn’t been playing?
Dull: Yeah, no. So he’s being ginger with it, right (uprise, question mark, I don’t know.) He’s taking care of it, right.
Taguchi: Do they think he’ll be alright?
Dull: So (pause) they’re trying to see where he’s at, and that. Right? He’s running better than what he was. In fact, recently he made a play that looked harder than it wa…then what it wa…um…it is what it is.
(Groans are now emanating from all around. Eyes are rolling in their sockets. A very uncomfortable air sets in).
Darvish: Craig’s a very good hitter.
Dull: He led the majors in hitting with runners in scoring position. He’s very unique.
Wright: When did he get injured?
Dull: So, (Taguchi…) I feel like I want to say the end of August.
Bob, in Dull’s ear: September 4th, Cincy, remember?
Dull: At the end of the day it doesn’t matter. See, look, he’s ran a lot. He’s running good.

Darvish bolts upright and takes his leave. He’s exhausted by Dull’s inane patter. Taguchi and Wright are hanging in there.
Taguchi: Who will win tonight, Mr. Dull?
Dull: I tell you what, you know, maybe if you were still with the Cardinals..
Taguchi: (Smiling) They’d have a chance?
Dull: Right, so you would be the difference-maker.
Taguchi: Come on, Mr. Dull!
Dull: You hit ’em in the huevos rancheros a few years ago, right? I’m right, right?

The assembled group disperses. Bob and Dull grab their sacks and start trudging up the steps. Dull turns to Bob and says,
Anyway, I can’t wait to see Tavares!
It’s Taveras. Why do all you guys pronounce it wrong?
I’m not wrong. He’s gonna burn down the house. Don’t you know that “Disco Inferno” song? Who did that?
Tavares.
You are so right…

Avoiding the Push Down the Rabbit Hole

I’ve been hanging around coffee forums again, and realized my dander was rising to levels requiring a post here, away from the proscribed topics and heat of the public fray. Frequently, a new member will pop into the forums to ask about using an air popper to roast coffee. Around and around we go about how inadequate this method is; do it some other way; why put yourself through it? Maybe because it’s the best coffee has tasted. Maybe it’s a lot of fun–the act of roasting–and you learn a lot about coffee. It could be because it’s so fresh. It’s cheaper, too.
Risking the curmudgeon tag, there’s a trend in coffee shops today, a phase in which the apex of coffee roasting is to take the roast just to the end of first crack. This is called a City roast. One is supposed to be able to divine origin flavors and characteristics of a particular varietal. If you roast too far you burn up the sugars and burn off the flavors unlocked by the roasting process. That’s all good and sensible. But often sweetness is left on the table, as the gods of the roast are in thrall to acidity above all other qualities of a high end cultivar. If they roasted anywhere from 15 to 50 seconds longer sweetness would be increased.
It’s iron law right now. I’d been waiting for months for the newest emporium to open, and since the proprietors all migrated from an old-line, mainstream roaster I anticipated a more flexible take on roasting. Nope, it’s all City, all pourover, all the time. Putting a medium roast on a coffee is verboten.
I have bought brewed coffee at all the best shops in town. I have had a vacpot of the same coffee I roast and brew at home using a popper and French Press. I have had V60 pourovers of Ethiopias, Kenyas, and a Sulawesi. They were uniformly better than anything one might get at a restaurant or hotel, but none were nearly as good as what I do at home, while kneeling and shaking a popper loaded with 68 grams of gray-green seeds. They are not “beans”.
The owners

Continue reading

Thoughts

My father, Bryce Byrne Hudgins, died on June 24, 2013. We were very close. I wrote this the other day.

A sunny summer day doesn’t feel the same to me anymore.
It doesn’t feel the way I have conceived of a
sunny summer day.

I’ve always thought of a day like this as holding
potential for unalloyed fun,
an unremarked and uninflected freedom.

Now, it feels like a quiet harbinger…there’s something
quiet about it.
It makes me reflect the way
a gray rainy day in November may spur others
to quietly reflect.

As the rain hitting the streets
dampens some sounds and amplifies those of others
in movement, so the bright sky figuratively
stands testament,
illuminating, allowing thoughts of
the movement that ceased.

The imagination informed by youth is stilled,
overcome by the enlivened adult one.
The volume and flow that had been available
was put on a slow, inexorable mute.
The sun shines brilliantly. It’s quiet now.

First Roast in a Popper

image

I’m having techical troubles so this is a test. I achieved a City+ roast on my first real try today. One can see the color is quite uniform.
I use a French press but I need to get a pourover device in the mix for this type of roast. This looks like a “Sump” special!